Archive for July, 2011

Realtor to run Public Utility

July 21, 2011

No conflict of interest here … move along, move along, nothing to see here

Note: Cape Fear Public Utility Authority (CFPUA) provides the water and sewer service for both the city of Wilmington and all of New Hanover County, North Carolina

More on James Quinn from the Cape Fear PUA release:
“Quinn is a commercial and investment real estate broker affiliated with Creative Properties, Inc. A graduate of East Carolina University, he has served in many civic and service organizations. For Wilmington Downtown, Inc. he has served as President of the Board of Directors and as Chairman of the Economic Development Committee. He is a member of the Wilmington Regional Association of Realtors where he served as Chairman of the Political Affairs Committee and is a member and past president of Commercial Investment Industrial Division of the Multiple Listing Service. He has served on the Wilmington City Council. “

Letter sent to New Hanover County Commissioners

James Quinn was recently appointed as chairman of Cape Fear PUA. He was noted as a long time commercial and investment real estate broker and developer who has served on the Wilmington city council among other organizations. Those are his sole qualifications to run a public utility company.
The appointment of Mr. James Quinn as Chairman of Cape Fear PUA is an appalling failure of our County Commissioners to fulfill their duty to the taxpaying, rate paying citizens of New Hanover. This appointment needs to be rescinded and a new chairman found that will keep the interests of the county, not developers upper most in their work. It isn’t important how many boards, civic or service organizations Mr. Quinn has served on, he has been an integral part of the New Hanover problems not its solutions. If his service on the Wilmington city council is any example of his impact it is eminently clear that he will not be a positive force for the county. And, exactly how hard is it to find a chairman who might actually know something about how to run a utility?
As a realtor and developer he will use his appointment to further the interests of those business constituents to the utter detriment of the rest of the county. The history of Cape Fear PUA is one of gross failure to maintain existing systems while constantly building out new areas to enable … wait for it … new commercial and residential developments. Recently the utility publicly declared its commitment to provide utility service to every piece of dirt in the county whether needed, wanted or not. Now with his appointment Chairman Quinn won’t have to ask nicely or make coy political contributions for this process to accelerate he can simply direct the utility anywhere he chooses.
The glaringly obvious conflict of interest makes it tempting to ask what process was followed, who’s campaign kitty was embellished, what private promises were made to grease the skids for this appointment. It stinks gentlemen. As commissioners each of you should be ashamed. Each of you now has a duty to publicly explain your rationale for such a manifestly detrimental appointment. Is this the type of appointment that fits with Mr. Catlin’s campaign? Is this what Mr. Berger supported? Mr. Davis? I am disappointed but not surprised at Mr. Thompson and Mr. Barfield. This appointment begs to be canceled before it causes even further irreparable harm to New Hanover county.

Your Air Conditioner Ate Al Gore and Saved The Planet

July 20, 2011

Thanks Paciloquy!  (Highly recommend this blog)

I finally made it through the paper by Dr. Qing Bin Lu. As you may guess I could not follow the math. But there was enough verbiage to explain his process and conclusions to make me think I grasped the point. How’s that for certitude?

In my somewhat simple terms the earth radiates energy in the form of heat and light (reflections?) in a range of the electromagnetic spectrum. At the lower ranges of the spectrum CO2 and H2O constitute the primary barriers to that radiated energy. At the higher ranges it is mostly CO2. But the middle range, where most if not much of the radiation occurs is the area where CFC’s are the primary radiant barrier.  Dr. Lu’s paper shows that the level of CFC’s has a strong inverse correlation to the amount of radiated energy and therefore a
strong positive correlation to global temperature increases. Thus, in his opinion, buttressed by his research, it is CFC’s that account for known rises in global temperature not CO2. And, which account for the decline in global
temperatures in the current decade.

Further, he questions how CO2 could be the culprit, the radiant barrier, when historic increases in atmospheric CO2 do not correspond to any increase in global temperature. Going one step further Lu shows that the recent
decades decline in global temperatures correlates to a decline in the atmospheric levels of CFC’s (albeit with a nine year lag). And he notes that the ban on CFC’s should in fact accelerate the cooling effects for a
multi-decade period in the future.

However, I am puzzled by your comments regarding some higher levels of CO2 that cause (I think this is right) climate forcing of higher temperatures.

Climate sensitivity to a doubling of CO2 is still unsettled.  It is the slavish acceptance of some data and the rejection of other data that drives the CAGW hypothesis.  Lu makes a powerful argument for more study and perhaps a re-calibration of climate sensitivity to CO2 but he is also making the argument that the climate sensitivity is larger i.e., a larger greenhouse effect, from a higher sensitivity to water vapor.  If Lu is incorrect on CFCs and the larger water vapor sensitivity then his theory collapses.  I find Lu’s hypothesis intriguing but then that makes methane, CH4, more troublesome because the same water vapor sensitivity would apply to increases in methane.  But this is how science advances.  As to my comments on the log behavior of CO2 concentrations and sensitivity I am favoring a lower sensitivity but I believe the pure radiative potential is still 4 W/m^2 as per Modtran.  Lu is not denying the radiative potential just that it does not show up in observations so he concludes that the net forcing is much less than 4 W/m^2.

My take away, other than that air conditioners can cool the jets on Al Gore’s CO2 plane, is that we may dodge a huge economic bullet by not shutting down the global economy in a futile gesture to corral CO2 when in fact the CFC tumor is shrinking from radiation treatments. Did I mix enough metaphors there?

I also read the bit about switching from coal to natural gas as a mechanism to reduce the CO2 impact on the planet. No doubt it will do so and for economic reasons may be preferable. But is the CO2 impact in and by itself
sufficient to warrant a change? Or  would a future technological advance provide a better, cheaper, alternative mechanism. Say natural gas electric generators dedicated to creating hydrogen for fuel cells? By dedicating the electrical output the plant can run more efficiently than if it was used to buttress the variable demands of the electrical grid. Plus that way we burn hydrocarbons in a controlled process (read: cleaner) to generate future energy. As opposed to catalytic cleaners on millions of automobiles. Until we develop a vessel to handle the hot salts required for Thorium reactors of course.